![]() ![]() So the change in terminology is different which may give fresh perspective, but the words in themselves don’t fully account for Jesus as Chief Shepherd and therefore need to be explained anyway. It is also legitimate in relation to the other pastors in the church (Jesus excluded). It still has the potential problem of not considering Jesus in the pastoral leadership. I think Lead Pastor has the exact same problems. But the title Senior Pastor is legitimate in relation to the other pastors in the church (Jesus excluded). It may sound like Jesus is not considered in the pastoral leadership. I see the potential problem with Senior Pastor. ![]() But does “lead pastor” do better? Isn’t Jesus more of the lead pastor than the lead pastor of Mars Hill Church (and other local churches)? Doesn’t Jesus hold l eadership over the lead pastor of a church? He clearly does. He is more “senior” than the senior pastor. I can easily see why Driscoll and others would equate Chief Pastor with Senior Pastor, because Jesus holds seniority in pastoring every true local church. So Jesus, according to Peter, is the Chief Pastor. The greek word can be translated pastor or shepherd which mean the exact same thing. Driscoll and others equate Chief Shepherd with Senior Pastor. ![]() I heard Mark Driscoll recently say that Jesus is the Senior Pastor of churches and that senior pastors should be called, “lead pastor.” He gets the idea from 1 Peter 5:4 which says, “And when the chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading crown of glory” (ESV). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |